I already opened and closed two browser windows while writing these two sentences. Most students in the school feel that that learning is quiet boring and they are asked to do well in certain subjects, or they will fail. Education needs reforming, and the speaker believes that education should wake the kids up, focus on group work, be more effective and protect the divergent thinking of the kids. The audience demographic can also include viewers who are curious about new and original ideas, and want to explore the new thoughts that are relevant to current society. . As a result, we were forced to showcase our mastery of the material in multiple ways.
To do this we must overcome the immovable object set down but tradition and bureaucracy. In this seismic talk, Sir Ken Robinson argues that it is the case that our education systems are consistently failing our children and that we need a radical rethink to overhaul them. Schools create a narrow window in which they define smart students, excluding others with different skills just as important. In a more formal setting, it is difficult to actively process and analyze what a speaker is saying because one has to shift through language and technical terms. This characterizes the audience in the first section of this essay analyzing the talk.
Conformity is valued not just for student success but also for schools to maintain their accreditation and funding. Creatively, this is a tremendously liberating ability. While the video contains some valid points, there are general flaws in its proofs that make degrade its quality. This made much more people suffer than benefit. I have set myself to the task of finding out how to break through that barrier. Myself as one of our tutors; follow a British author and speaker called Sir Ken Robinson as he finds some of his speeches and theories really refreshing in the world of education to assist students to achieve their potential. However, Sir Ken Robinson gives a straight-forward talk with common language that anyone can understand, engaging the audience.
When we actually reached the pharmacy, the feeling was changed to feeling disturbed, for half of the camp was standing in line. In his talk, Sir Ken Robinson uses mediocre logos. Throughout the speech, Sir Ken Robinson fails to provide sources that could add credibility to his speech, instead relying on his own name and reputation to supply reliability. Since the public education system was designed in the industrial revolution years, it turned out to be mainly focusing on academic performance. Through this sense of community, he makes all of them feel as if they have a joint responsibility to take care and help prepare the younger generation. However, to raise the low standard does not mean to raise the depth in the sea of academy. Sir Ken Robinson also creates ethos during his speech.
That said, it seems like you use this informational first paragraph as your introduction. The education divides students into academic and non-academic people by their academic performance, but it treats the different divided students with largely different method—like what the enlightened people in that industrial revolution time did to the working class. After completing the video and questions, reflect on the information. This helps the audience connect with Sir Ken by showing that they have the same values. The adherence to standardized testing has only further disabled the ability of educators to evolve and restructure our schools. But the truth is certificate is not the guarantee for jobs. He is an expert in this field and therefore well-versed in the rhetoric and research in that area.
If at the early stage in life they are tranquilized, how will the know how to behave later on in life with out all of this medication? The first paragraph otherwise is great at establishing your ethos on the topic. It has allowed me to break down the barriers that were put in place in my early education. I think that this is a well-written essay so far and I am very interested to see how it is completed. And as a tangent, I think the fact that we are giving young children derivates of methamphetamine so they can fit into a certain system is absolutely ridiculous. Prescribing medication to children without addressing the root of their lack of focus perpetuates a system of need that only benefits the pharmaceutical industry.
Hence academic and non-academic, smart and not smart people were categorized. Giving kids enough options to find the academic vehicles that serve them best only helps to embolden their own creativity, drive and empowerment over their education. I hope very soon to start putting some ideas out there but it is a large puzzle with many dynamic pieces and few proponents. Before, I was frustrated, but now I find some other kinds of values in being distracted including opportunity for engagement as you say. It is the system and the whole system desperately needs to be overhauled. Perhaps, not only schools, but all of us have to change the conception of study.
This old scheme inherited from the past does bring a progress in certain people, but bring disasters to most students. Even if there is only one correct answer in an exam, it can be reached in many different ways. This means that you are having excellent training provided to you by tutors who know how to adapt their teaching to suit learning styles and skill level to challenge and motivate you to reach your desired goals. I am very interested to see how it all turns out. At the end of this draft, you set up the next part of your essay that will analyze the video.