When poor research practices are used, the data that is obtained could be invalidated. In some cases, animals are forced to eat excessively, are forced medication, or are forced to do or consume other things. Restraining or putting a ban on animal testing, will prevent us from finding essential cures for deadly diseases. Those few which survive the harsh procedures spend the rest of their lives in captivity. Moreover, an animal lover who hasn't experienced the loss of a loved one due to a life-threatening disease is also not expected to comprehend the importance of animal testing. All the person wants is for his or her loved one to live longer. Con: Inhumane Treatment in Animal Experimentation Any discussion of animal testing pros and cons must acknowledge that certain kinds of animal research involve subjecting creatures to what can aptly be described as torture.
The same thing goes to using artificial human skin, where virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures are done through computer models. Aspirin, for example, was almost shelved because it proved dangerous for animals. It is not the intention of the committee to interfere in any way with research or experimentation. Across the globe, new products ranging from drugs for cancer, diabetes, and heart disease to cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoos, etc. They are not given the right amount and type of anesthesia, that makes them susceptible to extreme suffering due to the experiments performed on them.
Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species. For this animal testing is very crucial, because it helps in understanding this virus. Con: Lack of Applicability One of the leading arguments against animal testing is that it is simply a waste of scientific energy and resources, because the results of tests done on other species often cannot be reliably extrapolated to humans. Although, it is claimed none of the animals were hurt in the test, but how can one be 100% sure? Some of the most beneficial things that have come from medical testing on animals are Penicillin, various asthma treatments, and insulin. Over 25 million animals are used for experimentation in the U. It enhances the safety of the products being released. One such alternative that should be given full support is the microfluidic chip, also known as organs on a chip.
. Do the pros outweigh the cons of animal testing? Those in favor of animal testing argue that experiments on animals are necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge. Fewer animals are used in research than as food for humans Compared to the amount of chicken, cattle, sheep and pigs that humans eat, relatively few of them are used in experimentation. If animal testing was to be outlawed, then there would be very little scope of obtaining vital information necessary to eliminate suffering and premature deaths in both humans and animals. Animal testing helps in finding ways to help save lives of animals and humans by testing lifesaving drugs and processes.
The public outcry caused by this incident and other similar disasters led to the passing of the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requiring safety testing of drugs on animals before they could be marketed. Animal testing is an integral part of medical research, without which advancements and breakthroughs regarding treatment of critical diseases cannot be made. Certain companies breed animals solely for this purpose. For example, insulin was discovered through a test where dogs had their pancreases removed. Many animals used in testing are euthanized after experiments by being forced to inhale carbon dioxide. Computers cannot predict an outcome, just the possibility and tissue culture cannot predict the physical implications of a drug like rashes, cardiac failure, etc. Moreover, several other animal drugs available today are the products of animal testing itself.
Innumerable educational institutes, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, and several other scientific institutes use animal experimentation for research purpose. But obviously, the lives of those animals which are killed in course of testing these products go in vain. Even though it is not mandatory to get premarket approval for all the products, the manufacturer is expected to place a warming note on the product if it has not been tested. Written by a cardiologist, this article provides a brief overview of the history of animal testing but ultimately argues that animal testing is necessary and beneficial. The preparation led to mass poisoning causing the deaths of more than a hundred people. As has been said earlier, an animal does not have the capability to express pain and suffering, and it is this drawback that human beings take advantage of to perform these dangerous experiments on. Reptiles, amphibians, fish, rats, and mice make up about 85% of the testing population in any given year.
Should Animal Experimentation Be Supported? Laboratory mice, for example, live for only two to three years, so researchers can study the effects of treatments or genetic manipulation over a whole lifespan, or across several generations, which would be infeasible using human subjects. Generally, testing protocols are often painful to the animal test subjects, where they are deprived of food and water, force-fed, physically restrained in long periods, inflicted with pain and wounds to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even purposely killed as part of the process. Human trials must be preceded by animal testing, as stated by the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Though these are developed and designed for positive purposes, there are still certain arguments discussing about the pros and cons of animal experimentations. Unfortunately, the world of animal experimentation is rife with examples such as these. It was found to have an inhibitory effect on morning sickness, and hence, thousands of pregnant women took the drug to relieve their symptoms.
This page offers a variety of pro and con quotes about animal testing from authors, doctors, professors, and other credible professionals. Due to the fact that medical science has only come so far, it cannot be guaranteed that all treatments that are given to animals will work for people and this can cause mistreatment of the animals as well as the medical mistreatment to people. All of the accused and recorded staff involved were fired and prosecuted. However, some scientists break this law as well, just like any other law. The British Royal Society has released a statement regarding animal research, noting that almost every 20th century medical achievement relied on the use of animals in some way during the development process. It provides an ethical alternative solution to testing. All suffering is undesirable, whether it be in humans or animals.
You may wish to escape the dreaded place that smells of disinfectants, chemicals and may be sure death, but cannot. Animal testing statistics show many creatures lose their lives during the course of experiments. Heartworm medicine was a product of animal testing and has proved to save the lives of millions of dogs across the globe. There are many successful medical researches done that has prove the effectiveness of various medical products and treatments that are being used today and has helped many people in their diseases. Such cruelty has to be definitely punished and cannot be ignored. People are now suggesting use of tissue culture, statistics and even computer models for carrying out the test. This does not give us the right to use another life for our benefits.